Legal Opinion

State v. Elting

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 4, 1992No. C5-91-2015PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant argues the trial court abused its discretion by imposing four consecutive sentences and by failing to apply her jail credit against each consecutive sentence.

FACTS

Appellant is a 25-year-old woman who has a 12-year-old’s psycho-social development level. Appellant induced six girls between the ages of five and eleven to engage in sexual conduct for money with a 74-year-old man.

Appellant pleaded guilty to four counts of solicitation, inducement and promotion of prostitution in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.322, subd. 1(1) (1990). The trial court imposed four…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. HennumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. State v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. State v. BromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Effinger v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. State v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Pageau v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API