State v. Elting
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant argues the trial court abused its discretion by imposing four consecutive sentences and by failing to apply her jail credit against each consecutive sentence.
FACTS
Appellant is a 25-year-old woman who has a 12-year-old’s psycho-social development level. Appellant induced six girls between the ages of five and eleven to engage in sexual conduct for money with a 74-year-old man.
Appellant pleaded guilty to four counts of solicitation, inducement and promotion of prostitution in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.322, subd. 1(1) (1990). The trial court imposed four…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. HennumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. BromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Effinger v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Pageau v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012