Legal Opinion
United States v. Feeney
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided October 20, 1980No. Crim. A. 80-CR-54PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WINNER, Chief Judge.
Under the principles of Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215, defendant Feeney seeks to present evidence said to be material to sentencing and important to his motion for judgment of acquittal or a new trial. He has subpoenaed government officials who, Feeney says, can testify to facts which will demonstrate that he was at all times cooperating with the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New, York; that he was acting with what he thought was official approval of his conduct and that he had no…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena East National Bank of DenverDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1981
- Clary v. County Court in & for City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
- Zinke v. United States Department of the Treasury (In re Zinke)District Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- Murphy v. United States Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025