Legal Opinion

Murphy v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided June 16, 2025No. 1:24-cv-03127Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Nina Y. Wang Civil Action No. 24-cv-03127-NYW RICK EDWARD MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Under

5 U.S.C. § 301

and United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen,

340 U.S. 462

(1951), federal agencies may adopt procedures regulating their employees’ ability to testify in court about work-related matters. Those regulations are commonly referred to as “Touhy regulations,” and a request for information or testimony under those regulations is known as a “Touhy…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Kobach v. United States Election Assistance CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  5. Bandimere v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API