Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena East National Bank of Denver

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided June 24, 1981No. Civ. A. 81-W-667PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WINNER, Chief Judge.

Grand Jury subpoenas were served on Southeast State Bank and East National Bank of Denver. Those subpoenas commanded the production of customers’ records, and the banks and their lawyers found themselves on the horns of a dilemma. Their quandary stemmed from diametric conclusions of the United States Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of Colorado in the interpretation of the same provisions of the United States Constitution and the Colorado Constitution.

In United States v. Miller (1976) 425 U.S. 435, 96 S.Ct. 1619, 48 L.Ed.2d 71, a divided court held…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Burrows v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Valley Bank of Nevada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Doe Grand Jury ProceedingsDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1982
  2. United States v. Kemper Money Market Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. In Re the Grand Jury Proceedings of CastiglioneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1984
  4. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena, No. Gj 31District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1986
  5. United States v. Kemper Money Market Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API