Legal Opinion

Burney v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided February 16, 2000No. Civ.A. No. 97-W-1300-NPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

WALKER, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Caroline Burney filed the present action against Rheem Manufacturing Co., Inc. (“Rheem”) on August 27,1997, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, alleging that she was subjected to sexual harassment and discrimination on the basis of her sex with regard to “promotions, job assignments, initial hirings, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment.” (Complaint, 117).1 This action is presently before the court on the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant on January 16, 1998.…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Leathers v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
  2. Tolerico v. Home DepotDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Stallworth v. E-Z Serve Convenience StoresDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
  5. Chao v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API