Legal Opinion

Stallworth v. E-Z Serve Convenience Stores

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided February 5, 2001No. Civ.A. No. 99-D-1503-NPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DE MENT, District Judge.

Before the court is Plaintiffs Motion To Strike And For Sanctions, which was filed December 22, 2000. Defendant filed a Response on January 2, 2001, and Plaintiff issued a Reply on January 12, 2001. After careful consideration of the arguments of counsel, the relevant law, and the record as a whole, the court finds that the Motion To Strike And For Sanctions is due to be granted in part and denied in part.

I. DISCUSSION

The court finds that Plaintiff has made more than one request for the production of Defendant’s personnel files, including…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. BankAtlantic v. Blythe Eastman Paine Webber, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Van Nguyen v. IBP, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  3. Arthur v. Atkinson Freight Lines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. Burney v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tolerico v. Home DepotDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Chao v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2008
  3. Jones v. RoyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
  4. In re Mercedes-Benz Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
  5. Adams v. City of MontgomeryDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API