Ham v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LATTIMORE, Justice.
This is an appeal by Dwayne Arthur Ham from a conviction, under Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 20.04 (Vernon 1989), for the aggravated kidnapping of Lynette Ann Pike. Punishmant was assessed at fifty years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.
We affirm.
Ham’s first point of error states that, “There is insufficient evidence to sustain the verdict of guilt.” Ham’s briefing of this point consists of a detailed summary of the evidence presented at trial and the following argument:
Where as here there are conflicting inferences of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Royster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Wicker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Blankenship v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Bradford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Girdy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
- Cesar Danilo Vargas Juarez A/K/A Cesar Ramirez Hernandez A/K/A Cesar Hernandez Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
- Cesar Danilo Vargas Juarez A/K/A Cesar Ramirez Hernandez A/K/A Cesar Hernandez Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.