Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 15, 1989No. 964-86PublishedCited by 192 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CLINTON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary of a habitation pursuant to V.T.C.A., Penal Code § 30.02. The jury assessed punishment at eight years in the Texas Department of Corrections, and the conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals in a published opinion. Blankenship v. State, 715 S.W.2d 132 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1986). On appeal, appellant complained that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because the State failed to prove the burglarized premises was a “habitation” as defined by V.T.C.A., Penal Code…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Moss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Hargett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Chandler v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by192 opinions

  1. Villalon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Hathorn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Gibbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Rivera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

187 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API