Legal Opinion

Girdy v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided October 18, 2005No. 07-05-0076-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Steven G. Girdy, was convicted of the offenses of aggravated kidnapping and aggravated assault arising out of the same event. On appeal, he claims 1) the evidence was factually insufficient to support the conviction of aggravated kidnapping, 2) the evidence was factually insufficient to support the jury finding that he did not voluntarily release the victim in a safe place, and 3) he was subjected to double jeopardy. We affirm one judgment and reverse the other.

Issue One — Factual Sufficiency as to Intent

Appellant’s convictions arose out of a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Zuniga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Zuliani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Mason v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Girdy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Daniel Uballe v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
  3. Adam Silva v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  4. Adam Silva v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  5. Adam Silva v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API