Legal Opinion

Boykins v. Housing Auth. of Louisville

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1992No. 92-SC-242-DGPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Chief Justice.

The primary issue we decide on this appeal is whether an employer’s firing of a terminable-at-will employee for filing suit against the employer, on a matter not related to the employment, is violative of Section 14 of the Kentucky Constitution.

Karen C. Boykins was employed as an executive secretary by the Housing Authority of Louisville (hereinafter HAL). Nearly one year after her infant son was injured in an apartment owned, operated and managed by HAL, Boykins, as next friend of her infant son, filed suit against HAL alleging negligence. Approximately four months…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brockmeyer v. Dun & BradstreetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Grzyb v. EvansKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Firestone Textile Co. Division v. MeadowsKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Suchodolski v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Saylor v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Wymer v. JH Properties, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Commonwealth Department of Agriculture v. VinsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Thompto v. Coborn's Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
  4. Davidson v. Commonwealth, Department of Military AffairsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
  5. Murphy v. CockrellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API