Legal Opinion

Binford v. L. W. Lichtenberger Estate

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 30, 1983No. 40 908; CA A24119PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Plaintiff, payee on a promissory note, sought recovery from the estate of the deceased maker of the note 1 and from defendant, maker’s wife, who also had signed the instrument. Defendant defended on the grounds that plaintiff had given the maker an extension on the note without her knowledge and that plaintiff had failed to make timely presentment. The trial court found that (1) plaintiff had agreed to forebear collection of the note when the maker became delinquent, (2) defendant was an accommodation indorser and (3) plaintiff was not prompt in presenting the note to defendant for payment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Farmers State Bank v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. Lewis v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Lumbermen's Nat. Bank v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. King v. FinnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Stockwell v. Bloomfield State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. TaggartOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Seven Lakes Investment Group, Inc. v. CroweSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Fred Shearer & Sons, Inc. v. PrendergastCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API