Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank v. Taggart

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1987No. 86-1355PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The court of appeals determined that when a lending institution grants an extension of time to make payment to the primary obligor of a promissory note, which is secured by a mortgage, but does not otherwise involve the surety on the note, such surety is discharged by operation of R.C. 1303.01 et seq. (UCC Article 3), as adopted by the *10General Assembly. In this instance, for the reasons set forth hereinafter, we conclude otherwise, and accordingly reverse.

Appellee’s principal argument, relied upon by the court of appeals, derives from R.C. 1303.72(A) (UCC 3-606[l]), which states:

“Impairment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wohlhuter v. St. Charles Lumber & Fuel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Provident Bank v. GastOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bank of New Jersey v. PuliniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  4. Maine National Bank v. FontaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  5. Binford v. L. W. Lichtenberger EstateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. NajarOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Bogan v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Buckeye Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GuirlingerOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Word Investments, Inc. v. Bruinsma (In Re TML, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003
  5. Brown v. Rust (In re Rust)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API