Legal Opinion

Fred Shearer & Sons, Inc. v. Prendergast

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 1998No. 9410-07410; CA A91667Published

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Plaintiff in this action on a promissory note appeals from the dismissal of its complaint for failure to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim, ORCP 21 A(8), and from the award of attorney fees to defendant. On an appeal from the trial court’s grant of an ORCP 21 A(8) motion, we assume the truth of all well-pleaded facts alleged in the complaint and give plaintiff the benefit of all favorable inferences that may be drawn from those facts. Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc., 314 Or 576, 584, 841 P2d 1183 (1992). We reverse and remand.

The issue is whether plaintiffs complaint…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Anderson v. Chambliss Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Lemire v. McCollumOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Somers v. HansonOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Binford v. L. W. Lichtenberger EstateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API