Legal Opinion

Young v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 2018No. 361 C.D. 2016PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY PRESIDENT JUDGE LEAVITT

Otto Young petitions for review of an adjudication of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Parole Board) denying his request for administrative relief from one of the terms of his recommitment as a convicted parole violator. Young contends that the Parole Board erred by revoking sentence credit it had previously awarded him in a prior recommitment. Concluding that the Prisons and Parole Code (Parole Code), 61 Pa. C.S. §§ 101 - 6309, did not confer upon the Parole Board the discretion to revoke its award of sentence credit, we reverse the Parole…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Martin v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Armbruster v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. Giulian v. Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Penjuke v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Hudson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. A. Dean v. PPBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. A. Dean v. PPBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. A. Nunez v. WCAB (FedEx SmartPost, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API