Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*42OPINION
JUSTICE BAER
In this appeal, we consider whether the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (the “Board”) abuses its discretion where it fails to consider whether to grant a convicted parole violator (“CPV”) credit for time spent at liberty on parole. We also consider whether the Board must provide a contemporaneous statement explaining the rationale behind its decision to grant or deny credit to a CPV. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the Board abuses its discretion in failing to consider whether to grant CPVs credit for time spent at liberty on parole under the plain…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Rogers v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Fonner v. Shandon, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Zappala v. Brandolini Property Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. NatividadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by205 opinions
- Smith, D. v. PA Board of Probation & Parole, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- D. Smoak v. J.J. Talaber, Esq., Secretary PBPPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Penjuke v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Barnes v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Hughes v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.