Legal Opinion

Armbruster v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 2007PublishedCited by 142 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge KELLEY.

Matthew Armbruster (Armbruster) petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) which denied his request for administrative relief from a Board order recommitting Armbruster as a technical and convicted parole violator and recalculating his parole availability date and maximum expiration date. Also before this Court is the Board’s motion for remand to correct a clerical error. We grant the Board’s motion for remand and affirm the Board’s order in all other respects.

Armbruster, an inmate currently incarcerated at the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Martin v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Banks v. CainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. McCray v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Rodriques v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by142 opinions

  1. Richards v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. MannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Palmer v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Smith, D. v. PA Board of Probation & Parole, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Penjuke v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API