Legal Opinion

Raynes v. City of Leavenworth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1992No. 56382-9PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Appellants challenge the adoption of a zoning ordinance amending the City of Leavenworth (City) zoning code on the basis that the proceedings violated the appearance of fairness doctrine. We hold that the appearance of fairness doctrine does not apply because the proceedings were legislative, and affirm the trial court in all respects.

I

Leavenworth, Washington, is a tourist-oriented city located on Highway 2 on the east slope of the Cascade Mountains. To promote tourism, the Leavenworth Area Comprehensive Plan provides that certain areas of town, designated the Tourist Commercial (TC)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Smith v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Buell v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Lillions v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Fleming v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Clark County Public Utility District No. 1 v. WilkinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Robinson v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Robinson v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API