Robinson v. City of Seattle
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.
— The City of Seattle requires a preemployment urinalysis drug test for about half the vacancies filled by the City. Appellants here (the Taxpayers) challenge the constitutionality of this program. Because the testing constitutes a warrantless search without particularized grounds for suspicion, the City must show the program is narrowly drawn to achieve a compelling governmental interest. The program meets this standard only in part, and therefore violates article I, section 7 of the Washington State Constitution. We reverse the trial court’s dismissal of the challenge and remand for a…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- York v. Wahkiakum School Dist. No. 200Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- York v. Wahkiakum School District No. 200Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Robinson v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.