Legal Opinion

Robinson v. City of Seattle

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 2, 2000No. 45511-7-IPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.

— The City of Seattle requires a preemployment urinalysis drug test for about half the vacancies filled by the City. Appellants here (the Taxpayers) challenge the constitutionality of this program. Because the testing constitutes a warrantless search without particularized grounds for suspicion, the City must show the program is narrowly drawn to achieve a compelling governmental interest. The program meets this standard only in part, and therefore violates article I, section 7 of the Washington State Constitution. We reverse the trial court’s dismissal of the challenge and remand for a…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. York v. Wahkiakum School Dist. No. 200Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. York v. Wahkiakum School District No. 200Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Robinson v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API