Legal Opinion
Robinson v. City of Seattle
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 2, 2000No. 45511-7-IPublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
10 P.3d 452 (2000)
102 Wash.App. 795
Kirk ROBINSON; Jean Robinson; Patricia Carlisle; Oscar Eason, Jr.; Karen Jensen; John Junker; Don Moreland; Charles Royer; and The American Civil Liberties Union Of Washington, Taxpayers, Appellants,
v.
The CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, Respondent.
No. 45511-7-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
October 2, 2000.
Michael E. Kipling, Stokes Eitelbach & Lawrence, P.S.; Laura J. Buckland, Seattle, for appellants.
Frederick E. Wollett, Seattle, for Respondent.
ELLINGTON, J.
The City of Seattle requires a preemployment urinalysis drug test for about…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- York v. Wahkiakum School Dist. No. 200Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- York v. Wahkiakum School District No. 200Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. SurgeWashington Supreme Court · 2007
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.