Legal Opinion

Town of Windfall City v. State ex rel. Wood

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1910No. 21,564PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From Tipton Circuit Court; J. C. Blacklidge, Special Judge. Action by The State of Indiana, on the relation of George C. Wood, against the Town of Windfall City and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

1. Application by appellee for mandate against appellants, the town of Windfall City, and four named individuals, composing the board of trustees of that town, to compel them to act upon a petition on the part of relator, to disannex certain described lands from the town. To the complaint defendants addressed a demurrer reading as follows: “The defendants in the above-entitled cause demur separately and severally to the alternative writ issued herein, and the verified complaint of plaintiff upon which said writ was issued,” for the reason that “neither said writ nor said verified complaint…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lowe v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Whitesell v. StricklerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Indianapolis & Greenfield Rapid Transit Co. v. ForemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Hogan v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Keiser v. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ayer v. EwingIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Barker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Blair v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Modern Brotherhood v. MatkovitchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Ritz v. Indiana and Ohio RR, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API