Legal Opinion

United States v. Brumfield

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided August 28, 2015No. Case No. 1:95:CR:106PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM INTEREST PORTION OF FINE

GORDON J. QUIST, District Judge.

Pursuant to the Court’s February 11, 2015 Order, the government has filed a response to Defendant’s request that the Court waive, or relieve Defendant from, the interest portion of his fine. The Court requested the government to address whether the Court has jurisdiction to modify the judgment with regard to Defendant’s interest obligation and whether Defendant has demonstrated a material change in his economic circumstances that might warrant waiver of the interest.

For the following…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Daniel P. RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Arthur D. Seale, Arthur Seale, No. 92-5686. United States of America v. Irene J. Seale, Irene Jacqueline Seale, No. 93-5069Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Eric D. GoodeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Ronald StiffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Edmund PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. United States v. FieldsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API