Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronald Stiff

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 24, 2011No. 09-1115UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HELENE N. WHITE, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Ronald Stiff appeals the denial of his motion to modify his sentence in light of Amendment 706 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which lowered offense levels related to crack-cocaine offenses. We AFFIRM.

On September 13,1993, Ronald Stiff and two other persons were apprehended while in possession of various quantities of drugs, weapons and cash. Stiff was charged with, inter alia, conspiracy to distribute controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (Count I) and possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, heroin and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. United States v. Darwin Jay Copeland Anthony Antoine HartwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Jose Ramirez, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Vedo McClainCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. BrumfieldDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API