Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel P. Ross
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 29, 2001No. 00-3278PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSargus, J., joined by Siler, J.,
MERRITT, J. (p. 586), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
SARGUS, District Judge.
Daniel P. Ross (“Ross”), appellant herein, was convicted by a jury of the following: making false statements to a federally insured bank, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1010; making false statements to an agency insured by the Housing and Urban Development Department, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014; committing wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341; making false declarations before a grand jury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1523; and obstructing justice, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503.
Prior to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Lewis J. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- United States v. David Devon DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Climmie Jones, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. FincherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.