Legal Opinion
United States v. Mays
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 8, 2001No. 00-6039PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Pro se federal prisoner James V. Mays appeals a district court order that denied a motion in which he sought the rescission of a fine he received as part of his criminal sentence. The case has been referred to this panel pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. We unanimously agree that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
As part of his criminal sentence, Mays received a $100,000 fíne. This court affirmed Mays’s conviction and sentence on direct appeal. United States v. Mays, 77 F.3d 906, 909 (6th Cir.1996). In his direct appeal, Mays did not challenge the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Arthur D. Seale, Arthur Seale, No. 92-5686. United States of America v. Irene J. Seale, Irene Jacqueline Seale, No. 93-5069Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Jorge Torres A/K/A George Boyd, Jr. Jorge Torres, United States of America v. Jorge Torres A/K/A George Boyd, Jr. Jorge TorresCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Dennis W. LinkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. James v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. BrumfieldDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2015
- United States v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003