Legal Opinion
United States v. Johnson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 9, 2017No. Case No: 13-cr-36 RCLPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*58ORDER
Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge
Without objection, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Harvey.
Defendant’s use of medical marijuana is a violation of federal law. Defendants under federal supervision are prohibited *59from using medical marijuana even if that use is in compliance with D.C; law or the law of any other state.
The Court agrees, however, that in this case the defendant’s use was not a willful violation of his supervised release, and therefore defendant’s term of supervised release shall not be revoked.
Moreover, the Court agrees…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' CooperativeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. Alan NixonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. HicksDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- United States v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. EtheridgeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. HarrisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States v. George McLeod, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. John Edward SchostagCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. TrotterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- United States v. BeyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.