United States v. Alan Nixon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
We must decide whether a congressional appropriations rider that prohibits the Department of Justice from using certain funds to prosecute individuals for engaging in conduct permitted by state medical marijuana laws impacts the ability of a federal district court to restrict the use of medical marijuana as a condition of probation. We hold that it does not.
I
Defendant-Appellant Alan David Nixon pled guilty to aiding and abetting the maintenance of a drug-involved premise in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 856(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2(a). The district court sentenced Nixon to a three-year term…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' CooperativeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. Steve McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Gerald BainbridgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
4Cited by19 opinions
- Sandusky v. GoetzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Noah KleinmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Daniel TrevinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Matthew Davies v. Michael BenovCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.