Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hanson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 2013PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.1

This appeal centrally presents questions of statutory construction pertaining to the five-year mandatory minimum sentence attaching to the offense of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver (“PWID”), see 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(30), while in possession or control of a firearm. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9712.1(a).

I. Preliminary Overview

Section 9712.1(a) of the Sentencing Code provides:(a) Mandatory sentence. — Any person who is convicted of [PWID], when at the time of the offense the person or the person’s accomplice is in physical pos*1027session or control of a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. MacOlinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ValentineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. FennellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. CardwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. PersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Com. v. Gomez, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API