Commonwealth v. Hanson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SAYLOR.1
This appeal centrally presents questions of statutory construction pertaining to the five-year mandatory minimum sentence attaching to the offense of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver (“PWID”), see 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(30), while in possession or control of a firearm. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9712.1(a).
I. Preliminary Overview
Section 9712.1(a) of the Sentencing Code provides:(a) Mandatory sentence. — Any person who is convicted of [PWID], when at the time of the offense the person or the person’s accomplice is in physical pos*1027session or control of a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Commonwealth v. MacOlinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ValentineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. FennellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. CardwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. PersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Com. v. Gomez, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.