Commonwealth v. Cardwell
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
MUNDY, J.:
Appellant, Jamar Cardwell, appeals from the June 18, 2013 aggregate judgment of sentence of three to six years’ imprisonment, after he was convicted of one count each of possession with intent to deliver (PWID) and intentional possession of a controlled substance. 1 After careful review, we vacate and remand for resen-tencing.
We summarize the relevant factual and procedural background of this case as follows. On August 8, 2012, the Commonwealth filed an information charging Appellant with the above-mentioned offenses. On March 23, 2013, Appellant proceeded to a one-day…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ReidSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Com. v. Chichkin, I.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Melendez-Negron, J., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. CapleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.