Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. MacOlino

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 1983No. 104 E.D. Appeal Docket 1982PublishedCited by 178 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

McDERMOTT, Justice.

The appellee, Carl Macolino, was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, 1 and criminal conspiracy, 2 following a non-jury trial. At the same trial, appellee’s wife, Gae, was found guilty of criminal conspiracy. Carl Macolino, following the denial of post-trial motions, was sentenced to a prison term of eleven-and-one-half months to twenty-three months on the possession offense, and a consecutive sentence of three years probation on the conspiracy charge. Gae Macolino was sentenced to two years probation on the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LovetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. TIRPAKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. TownsendSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by178 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. ChesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. ValetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. VargasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API