State ex rel. Cuyahoga County v. State Personnel Board of Review
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Cuyahoga County asserts in its propositions of law that the court of appeals erred in dismissing its amended complaint for a writ of prohibition. The court of appeals concluded that the county’s amended complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. In order to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, it must appear beyond doubt that relator can prove no set of facts warranting relief, after all factual allegations of the complaint are presumed true and all reasonable inferences are made in relator’s favor. State ex rel. Findlay…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel. Adams v. GusweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. SchroederOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Litty v. LeskovyanskyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Solomon v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Disability & Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Department of Administrative Services v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Chari v. VoreOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Rosen v. CelebrezzeOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Chari v. VoreOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Buck v. MaloneyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Potts v. Commission on Continuing Legal EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.