Legal Opinion

Antonio P. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 1, 2008No. 1 CA-JV 07-0149PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRVINE, Judge.

■ ¶ 1 Antonio P. appeals from the juvenile court’s order placing his daughter with her maternal aunt and uncle instead of with the child’s paternal grandmother, Antonio’s mother. 1 We conclude that the preferences for placement contained in Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 8-514(B) (2007) do not mandate placing a child with a person with an acceptable higher preference if the juvenile court finds it in the child’s best interests to be placed with someone with a lower preference. Therefore, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Anna, born in April 2002, is the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. AnwayArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Willie G. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. US West Communications, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Mago v. Mercedes-Benz, U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Arizona Depatment of Economic Security v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. Jeff D. v. Department of Child SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. Tinsley v. McKayDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
  4. City of Sierra Vista v. Sierra Vista Wards System Voting ProjectCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. In Re Martin M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API