State Bank v. Northwestern Security Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
This is an action to recover on a guaranty by the defendant of the payment of notes payable to it and transferred to the plaintiff *509with a guaranty of payment. The court directed a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial. .
The defense is usury, not in the notes as between the maker and payee, but in the subsequent transaction between the payee and the plaintiff bank which took them at a discount with the guaranty of the payee.
To constitute usury there must be a loan with an agreement to repay with greater than…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lassman v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Trauernicht v. KingstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Rantala v. HaishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Becker's Investment Agency v. ReaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Seebold v. EustermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Mid-West Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Pomplun v. HudsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Minneapolis Discount Co. v. CroffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937