Legal Opinion

State Bank v. Northwestern Security Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 1924No. 23,922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

This is an action to recover on a guaranty by the defendant of the payment of notes payable to it and transferred to the plaintiff *509with a guaranty of payment. The court directed a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial. .

The defense is usury, not in the notes as between the maker and payee, but in the subsequent transaction between the payee and the plaintiff bank which took them at a discount with the guaranty of the payee.

To constitute usury there must be a loan with an agreement to repay with greater than…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lassman v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Trauernicht v. KingstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Rantala v. HaishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Becker's Investment Agency v. ReaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Seebold v. EustermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Mid-West Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  4. Pomplun v. HudsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Minneapolis Discount Co. v. CroffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API