Legal Opinion
Becker's Investment Agency v. Rea
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 21, 1896No. Nos. 9718-(174)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Russell, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
CANTY, J.2
The plaintiff, a corporation, did a loaning business at Rolla, North Dakota. The Bank of New England did a banking business at Minneapolis. During the years 1892 and 1893, plaintiff deposited with the bank a large number of notes made to plain*460tiff by persons residing in the vicinity of Rolla for loans made to them by it, and the bank paid to plaintiff the amount of the notes. The defendant has since been appointed receiver of the bank, and this action is brought to compel the surrender and delivery up to plaintiff of these notes, on the claim that the transactions were loans of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Farmers & Mechanics' Bank v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Merchants' National Bank of St. Paul v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- First National Bank v. PiersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
3Cited by4 opinions
- Meholin v. CarlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Stolze v. Bank of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- State Bank v. Northwestern Security Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Val Zimmermann Corp. v. LeffingwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982