Trauernicht v. Kingston
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to cancel a note as usurious and to compel tbe surrender of security pledged as collateral. There were findings for tbe plaintiffs. Tbe defendant appeals from tbe order denying bis motion for a new trial.
When a transaction takes tbe form of a sale of property, in this case corporate stock, having a market price at which it may be sold on any business day, and tbe sale price is in excess of market value, for which sale price a note is given, tbe purpose being to cover usury, tbe apparent vendor being a lender in disguise and tbe buyer a borrower, tbe intent being that tbe vendor shall…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co. v. KrumseigSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Patterson v. WymanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Scott v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Barry v. ParantoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Exley v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Seebold v. EustermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Rose v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- E. C. Warner Co. v. W. B. Foshay Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.