Legal Opinion

Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. v. Seamaster Logistics, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 19, 2012No. Case Nos. 10-cv-5591-SC, 11-cv-2861-SCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Now pending before the Court is the motion of Defendant American Global Logistics, LLC (“Defendant” or “AGL”) for partial summary judgment against Plaintiff Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. (“Plaintiff’ or “MOL”). ECF No. 123 (“Mot.”).1 The motion is fully briefed and, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7 — 1(b), suitable for decision without oral argument. ECF Nos. 133 (“Opp’n”), 144 (“Reply”). As set forth below, AGL’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

II. BACKGROUND

The following background facts are…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Stmicroelectronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Yamauchi v. CottermanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  3. Lee Cheramie v. Hbb, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Clark v. Nordic Naturals, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
  5. Lee Cheramie v. Hbb, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API