Legal Opinion

Clark v. Nordic Naturals, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 5, 2025No. 5:24-cv-04058Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 DAYNA CLARK, Case No. 24-cv-04058-EKL 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 10 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 11 NORDIC NATURALS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 27 Defendant. 12 13 14 This false advertising action arises out of Plaintiff’s purchase of Defendant’s omega-3 fish 15 oil supplements and her allegations that the product labels are false and misleading. Before the 16 Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 27 (“Mot.”). The Court 17 carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  4. Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API