Legal Opinion

Clark ex rel. Clark v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1969No. 6911SC82Published

1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether plaintiff offered sufficient evidence of defendant’s negligence to require submission of the case to the jury. We hold that he did.

Defendant relies heavily on Webb v. Clark, 264 N.C. 474, 141 S.E. 2d 880. He contends that plaintiff’s own evidence discloses that the cause of the accident was not speed on the part of defendant but the fact that defendant’s vehicle suddenly and without notice came upon ice which made it impossible for defendant to stop. In his brief, defendant argues that he had no notice of, or reason to suspect the *278presence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Mitchell v. . MeltsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Hardee v. Charles Worth YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Wise v. LodgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Saunders v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API