Legal Opinion

In Re Dewar

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 14, 1930PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

The petitioner was convicted of intoxication before a justice of the peace. Thereupon, he was duly sworn and required to disclose the person of whom he obtained the liquor which produced such intoxication. He refused to do so on the ground that it would tend to criminate him. He was adjudged to be in contempt, and was committed to jail. He then brought these habeas corpus proceedings, which were duly adjourned into this Court agreeably to the provisions of G-. L. 2221. The importance of the question here submitted for our determination is obvious. On the one hand, a nullification of No. 203,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Arndstein v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1920

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. StacySupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. State v. McElreavySupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. State v. RheaumeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  4. In Re HarrandMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Jennings v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API