Legal Opinion
State v. Rheaume
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 9, 2004No. 02-400PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Defendant Roy Rheaume was convicted by a jury of
driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), 23 V.S.A. § 1201; this DUI conviction was defendant’s third and accordingly classified as a felony. See 23 V.S.A § 1210(d) (person convicted of three or more DUIs shall be fined not more than $2,500 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both); 13 V.S.A § 1 (“any offense whose maximum term of imprisonment is more than two years ... is a felony”). Prior to his jury trial where he was convicted, defendant moved to suppress statements concerning his identity. These statements were made in…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- United States v. Victor Montano DislaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- State v. JewettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cruz, Adelfo RamirezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- State v. ProvostSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- State v. OneySupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- State v. Hieu TranSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.