Legal Opinion

Mason v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 4, 1917No. 604PublishedCited by 229 opinions

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA, SECOND DIVISION. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

Plaintiffs in error were separately called to testify before a Grand Jury at Nome, Alaska, engaged in investigating a charge of gambling against six other men. Both were duly sworn. After stating that he was sitting at a table in the Arctic Billiard Parlors when these men were there arrested, Mason refused to answer two questions, claiming so to do might tend to incriminate him. (1) “Was there a game of cards being played on this particular evening at the table at which you were sitting?” (2) “Was there a game of cards being played at another table at this time?” Having said that at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Heike v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

3Cited by229 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

224 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API