Legal Opinion

Podesta v. Podesta

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 16, 1945PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKetchum, J.

By their bill in this case the complainants Miss Elizabeth Podesta and Mrs. Emma Fransioli, sisters of Charles Podesta, deceased, seek to recover from Mrs. Elizabeth iStagner Podesta, individually, and in her capacity as executrix of the will of Charles Podesta, (1) the unpaid balances alleged to be due them under the will of the testator of date September 21, 1915; and (2) their attorneys’ fees and expenses in contesting a later writing made in 1933 which was offered for probate as the holographic will of said testator but which was held not to be entitled to probate as such because not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Magevney v. KarschTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Hoggatt v. CloptonTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Milam v. MilamTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Frank v. FrankTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Hickey v. BeelerTennessee Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of VincentTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Burdick v. GilpinTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  3. American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. ManderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  4. First National Bank of Gatlinburg v. Charles Blalock & Sons, Inc. (In Re Just for the Fun of It of Tennessee, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980
  5. Moore v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API