Legal Opinion

Hickey v. Beeler

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1943PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pbewitt

This case is before us on petition for certiorari. The petition presents two main issues: (1) That the will offered for probate was procured by reason of the undue influence of Oliver M. Hickey over the testatrix; and (2) that testatrix had, subsequent to the execution of the will in 1936, executed another will in which she made an entirely different disposition of her property. The second issue is the only one strongly stressed by petitioner; that is, petitioner insists that the declarations of the testatrix as to the will of 1936' are admissahle as evidence.

Ida M. Miller was horn in Bradley…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Throckmorton v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Moor v. ParksMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Earp v. EdgingtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Ricketts v. RickettsTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Allen v. JeterTennessee Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cude v. CulbersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  2. In Re Estate of EdenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. Podesta v. PodestaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  4. Sanders v. McClanahanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  5. Shrum v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API