Legal Opinion
In Re Deutchman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 2004No. 03-BG-997PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
On August 4, 2003, the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarred respondent Murray L. Deutchman based on a joint petition for disbarment by consent. 1 In the petition he acknowledged that he was under investigation for conversion of client funds and that there was evidence sufficient to support the allegations. 2
Bar Counsel notified us of this action and we temporarily suspended respondent on October 1, 2003, pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11(d), and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) for a determination of whether identical, greater or lesser discipline…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re SteelyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re ChasnoffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In re SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005