Ash v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Prohibition originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District to restrain the Superior Court from proceeding with an action to cancel certain registrations of voters. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
On the twenty-seventh day of March, 1917, an action was commenced in the superior court of San Bernardino County by Grant Holcomb and others, electors in'the city of San Bernardino, against the county clerk of San Bernardino County, to compel the clerk to cancel certain registrations of voters. The action was instituted in accordance with section 1109 of the Political Code, which reads as follows: “Any person may proceed by action in the superior court to compel the clerk to cancel any registration made illegally, or that ought to be canceled by reason of facts that have occurred subsequent…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re WardNew York Supreme Court · 1892
- Pohlmann v. PattyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Communist Party of United States of America v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Greif v. DulleaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Pierce v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Ambassador Petroleum Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.