Legal Opinion

United States v. Riedl

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided October 11, 2001No. CR. 98-0624ACKPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR STAY OF FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE PENDING APPEAL

KAY, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

On November 24, 1999, Brigitte Riedl (“Defendant”) was convicted by a jury of one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, two counts of aiding and abetting the distribution of cocaine, one count of distributing cocaine, and five counts of money laundering. The jury additionally found by special verdict that nine properties owned by Defendant were involved in the money laundering offenses and were subject to forfeiture to the United States.

On December 20,1999,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States of America, (97-6308/6309) v. David Tex Hill, (97-6051/6286)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. BachnerDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1990
  4. United States v. Various Tracts of Land in Muskogee & Cherokee CountiesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. ElliottDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. PetersDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011
  2. United States v. BradleyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API