United States v. Peters
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, Chief Judge.
1. Presently before this Court is Defendant Frank E. Peters’s Motion for Partial Stay of Forfeiture Pending Appeal. (Docket No. 553.) Peters seeks to stay forfeiture of 513 Mesquite Hills, Lot 26, Palm Desert, CA (“Lot 26”), an undeveloped parcel in a development that borders the Bighorn Country Club golf course. The government opposes the motion.
2. To “ensure that the property remains available pending appellate review,” a court may stay an order of forfeiture pending appeal, if there is sufficient cause to do so. Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.2(d). The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. RiedlDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2001
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. DroganesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2012