Legal Opinion

United States v. Various Tracts of Land in Muskogee & Cherokee Counties

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 10, 1996No. 95-7155PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Before TACHA and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

We have before us appellant’s motion for an injunction against the sale of forfeited property pending appeal. Upon consideration, the motion is denied.

Appellant raises a legal argument we have not previously addressed. 28 U.S.C. § 1355(c) states: “Upon motion of the appealing party, the district court or the court of appeals shall issue any order necessary to preserve the right of the appealing party to the full value of the property at issue, including a stay of the judgment of the district court pending appeal....” Focusing on the word “shall,”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. In re the Seizure of All Funds in Accounts in Names Registry Publishing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Various Tracts Of Land In Muskogee And Cherokee CountiesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. RiedlDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API