de Arnaz v. Escandon
California Supreme Court
Appeal by defendants, Francisca S. de Escandon and Angel G. Escandon, from a judgment for the plaintiff in the Superior Court of Ventura County. Hines, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Ross, J.:
Neither the pleadings nor the findings in this case are what they ought to be. We are opinion, however, that the judgment must be affirmed.
From the findings it appears that the land in controversy, *488called the Rancho Los Pitos, was conveyed in June, 1874, to the defendant Francisca Escandon, then and still the wife of the defendant Angel Escandon, hy deed of grant, bargain, and sale, which deed expressed a money consideration; and it seems to he conceded on both sides, that the facts found by the Court in relation to the conveyance show that the rancho thereby became the separate…
2Cited by7 opinions
- J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Schultz v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Le Mesnager v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- First National Bank of Hailey v. GlennIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.