Busch v. Midland Finance Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
From a decree dismissing his suit in equity brought against the appellees, the appellant has appealed. For convenience, the parties will be referred to as follows: the appellant as Busch, the appellees as the Midland and the trust company.
Without going into unnecessary detail, the facts are, in substance, these: Busch had some $-300,000 of uncollected and perhaps un-collectible past due .notes. An agent of the Midland solicited him to avail himself of the collection service of that company, stating that it had a new plan for making collections, which succeeded where all…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Clews v. JamiesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- McCarty v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Claiborne-Reno Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ReissSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Southern Ry. Co. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Southern Ry. Co. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944