Legal Opinion
Tacoma Narrows Constructors v. Nippon Steel-Kawada Bridge, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 24, 2007No. Nos. 34901-9-II; 35241-9-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., appeals two pretrial rulings: (1) the trial court’s denial of Samsung’s motion to stay proceedings and to compel arbitration of Nippon Steel-Kawada Bridge, Inc., and Nippon Steel/Kawada Joint Venture’s (collectively NSK) claims against Samsung and (2) the trial court’s granting of NSK’s motion for leave to amend its complaint, asserting a new claim against Samsung. Holding that the NSK-Samsung contract does not compel arbitration of this dispute,1 we affirm.
Hunt, J.
FACTS
I. The Parties & Contracts
¶2 This litigation involves a series of contracts and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brinkley v. Monterey Fin. Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 4th District2015
- Nelson v. Westport Shipyard, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Nelson v. Westport Shipyard, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Brinkley v. Monterey Financial Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Justin Oakley, V. Domino's Pizza LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.